9/23/2019 Orcad Pspice Torrent
Orcad 10.5 + Crack (Pspice + PCB Editor + Capture CIS) File marked as fake or malicious, links removed. Using BitTorrent is legal, downloading copyrighted material isn’t. Be careful of what you download or face the consequences. Jul 25, 2018 One of the most popular ones is OrCAD. OrCAD is the most powerful and intuitive tool to design printed circuit boards. The demo version offers you the possibility to evaluate the following functions: OrCAD Capture, OrCAD Capture CIS Option, PSpice A/D, PSpice A/A, OrCAD PCB Editor and SPECCTRA.
Discuss anything related to the field of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Power, electronics, electromagnetics, semiconductors, software engineering, embedded systems - it's all fair game! Rules for:. We won't do your homework for you.
If you have specific, targetted questions regarding homework, we will help you out only if you have provided some beginning work. Tech support help can be found in. If the problem is truly an engineering problem, we'll allow it, but fixing your laptop or a cracked LCD screen doesn't qualify. Keep brand wars to a minimum. Different products have different specs - if you're an engineer, keep discussions purely based on merit. Related subreddits:. Can't find your submission?
It was probably caught by reddit's spam filters. Send the moderators a message and we can unblock it as soon as possible. In general the differences are minor. Mainly it's:. Models for extreme corner cases (e.g.
Only Pspice as a nonlinear inductor model, Hspice has some unique MOS/BJT models for leading edge geometries, LTSpice is strictly not based on UCB SPICE 3 but the other two are, which both provides advantages and disadvantages in terms of simulation repeatability of models. Pspice and Hspice are commercial products that cost money (unless you torrent them); Ltspice is freeware. Also consider SPICE 2g6 and SPICE 3 from UCB - both are OSS and both are Berkeley licensed. All have shitty UIs - can't get away with that: people able to grok SPICE internals are generally incapable of grokking good UI design.
You've omitted some of HSPICE's strongest advantages (assuming it's within budget). Monte Carlo analysis.
Pole-Zero analysis. Powerful.ALTER mechanism that lets you run theme-and-variations groups of simulations with much greater flexibility than, for example, LTSPICE's '.STEP PARAM'.
![]()
Optimization! You can give HSPICE some knobs to twist, tell it what goal to aim for (e.g. Max bandwidth, min delay, min(power.delay), min(layoutarea.Tclkto-Q)), and let it rip.
HSPICE twists those knobs, runs a bunch of simulations, and returns the knob-settings that achieved your goal most optimally. HSPICE applies the Levenberg-Marquardt nonlinear optimization algorithm. I spent most of my time with PSpice trying to make the program play, instead of developing my circuit.
LTspice is (for me) much more straightforward to use. And it runs faster. The only feature I wanted that PSpice supported that LTspice didn't is Monte Carlo analysis.
I'm not familiar with HPspice. Don't underrate the free feature of LTspice, even if your company pays for PSpice. It's mighty handy to be able to work on your circuit at home, and you can't do that if the PSpice license is at work. Also, in our case, the number of PSpice seats was limited, and if another engineer in the other end of the building was using it, you would be shut out till he released the license.
Comments are closed.
|
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |